Friday, May 15, 2009

Respone to When is this all going to be over?

This is a response to "When is this all going to be over?"


I like this article because it is written from pure common sense and many people fail to understand our situation in the Middle East. When was the last time we heard about Osama Bin Laden on TV or the newspaper. Does anyone still remember who he is? This war continues to soil America’s good name even if the war’s purpose is to rebuild their country. We are spending a tremendous amount of money for that purpose but how will that help our own problems. Not only are we burning money to stay in the Middle East, we are doing so in other countries. AS of right now, we have over 750 military installments in 50 countries, and funding all this is not cheap. It requires money, money that we need. I hope we realize that occupying all these countries will do us more harm than good.



Friday, April 24, 2009

Response to “Let The American People Grow Our Own Crops”

I’m unclear on what “decision” you are talking about. As far as I know, there are no bans on producing our own crops. In the northern states, farms still produce corn, potato, beans, and grains such as wheat and rice. Other west coast states sill contribute fruits and vegetables as well. Although it is true that we import some crops and vegetables from other place, but that is because it is sometimes cheaper. Now if you are talking about the HR 875
Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009
, then growing tomatoes in your back yard is not illegal. The act sets tougher regulations on farms and factories that produces and sells for profit. The regulations are in set so that farmers and factories are not putting in chemicals and pesticides that can harm its consumers. Yes, the new bill makes it harder small farms to produce and sell, but it’ll make the products that go into the supermarkets safer. Take the peanut recalls for example. In late January to march, Peanut Corporation of America caused a salmonella outbreak that caused over 500 people to be ill.

Friday, April 10, 2009

America Again

There once was a time when America had money and used it for the good of people around the world, there once was a time when peace came from meetings and handshakes and there was once a time when people around the world looked upon America for leadership, hope and inspiration. All of these things seem far away today, but I know it's still there.

Our influence around the world must remain positive because it allows opportunities for America to prosper. For example, when we borrow money from other counties, we are competing with many other counties for that money as well. That is why our image is important. Also during times of negotiating peace talks and other crisis, we want our opinions to matter on the world stage to but if we set a bad example, like the way we entered war with Iraq, who would listen to us. During a town hall with Turkish students, Obama talked to the students about peace and prosperity and his ideals on the matter. Obama said "Words are good and understanding is good, but ultimately it has to translate into concrete actions ... These things take time, and the idea is that you lay the groundwork and slowly, over time, if you make small efforts, they can add up into big efforts."

I feel that President Obama is doing a great job in restoring a positive image back to America and will take serious step in restrengthening our country. The new president represents a new optimism and hopefully a new future.

Friday, March 27, 2009

New Regulations

According to an article by Veronica Salazar from USA TODAY, the cause of the economic meltdown can be traced back to big businesses making poor choices. The blog deals with an article concerning the regulations of stock markets, financing and high risk investments. Over the past months, the events concerning A.I.G’s bail-out and bonuses have led to the question, "Can we leave our financial well being to big corporations without oversights from the government?" The answer is clearly no. The article centers around the idea that regulations need to be in place as soon as possible to lessen the damage of future economy. Their failures threaten not only “their own viability but (also) the health of the financial system and the U.S. economy.” Without the help of the U.S government, these large businesses such as AIG would have gone under, with it the economy. However, these businesses cannot be left unregulated. She thinks that the ideas Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner outlined Thursday represent a logical starting point.


One, credit default swaps, a large and unsupervised market, must be regulated. They pose a threat in a highly interconnected market with “computerized global trading,” making debts’ credible backing unclear. This means large losses in times of economic downfall. “They're the chief reason taxpayers have put more than $180 billion into AIG.” Two, super-regulators should have “the same power to take over big non-bank financial institutions that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. now has to take over banks.” By taking out failing businesses, super regulators can help protect depositors and stabilize the economy. Three, hedge funds, “high-risk investment pools that remain largely unsupervised,” should be supervised more. “The hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management required a $3.6 billion bailout in 1998.” This shows that a company should not be given special treatment regardless of reputation or prestige. When they are borrowing money, a business must provide all necessary documents and evidence. Fourth, to prevent executives from burning down the house for quick profits, financial firms must pay their executives not for short-term performance, but for long-term profit. By doing this, shareholders-owners cut down excess spending and promote better performance.

The author clearly stresses the fact that if you're gambling with taxpayer money, you should accept reasonable limits on your business. The article also points out that If a corporation is too big to fail, it deserves to be broken up into much smaller banking corporations. I agree with that statement. We should have never let these banks get that big.